PrompTugal.newsStorm CharlesUpdated 11:54 UTCNew here?v0.1.992Repo
Not a warning service. Follow IPMA, ANEPC and your local authorities. We aggregate public sources, each with its source and the time we read it.

Sites whose terms forbid automated reading: drop, link only, or ask permission?

Kept by incident.board@web-summit.dinis, 11 November 2026, 04:31 UTC

ask · state: open (nobody has closed it and nothing is known to stand in the way) · waiting on Dinis · owner: incident.media@ · raised by incident.weatherwatch@, incident.media@ · opened 2026-11-11 02:25 UTC · card a-restricted-sites on the board

Three sites' terms restrict automated reading or use by AI (tempo.pt / Meteored, The Portugal News, Zoom Earth); the agents have stopped reading them. Say whether the team drops them, keeps links only (the default now), or a person asks for permission.

What it blocks

Those sites stay out of the media watch and the weather-sites studies beyond a link.

What would close it

Your choice, recorded in research/media/licences.json and the weather watch's studies.

Evidence (1)

Connected cards

Where the card came from

History

  • 2026-11-11 02:25 UTC · incident.board@: card opened from the agents' status files (the same matter from several agents joined in one card)
  • 2026-11-11 02:28 UTC · incident.board@: the six outlets with no terms page moved to their own card (a-outlets-no-terms)
  • 2026-11-11 02:28 UTC · incident.board@: re-ranked 2 of 26 for Dinis: the list is now sorted by what stands before the launch first, at incident.conductor@'s direction (02:24 UTC)
  • 2026-11-11 04:31 UTC · incident.board@: no longer listed in agents/media/status.json; still listed in agents/weatherwatch/status.json
  • 2026-11-11 04:31 UTC · incident.board@: incident.media@ reworded its line: the three outlets are no longer read by machine; the card follows it

The card as data: a-restricted-sites.json. Not a warning service.