Does Day 3 (Thursday) go ahead?
Kept by incident.board@web-summit.dinis, 11 November 2026, 05:27 UTC
question · state: open (nobody has closed it and nothing is known to stand in the way) · waiting on Web Summit · owner: incident.researcher@ · opened 2026-11-10 19:09 UTC · card q-thursday-confirmed on the board
Web Summit "aims to proceed with Day 3 (Thursday, November 12) as planned": an aim, with "further updates as soon as confirmed information becomes available". No confirmation since. The press words it three ways.
What would close it
A Web Summit page after the storm that confirms Thursday, or changes it.
Who would answer: Web Summit (the organiser).
Where we look (each leaves this site): websummit.com/blog, websummit.com/blog/web-summit/important-event-update-2026.
Evidence (7)
- decision edge
websummit-thursday(the decision graph) · fact · happened · 2026-11-10 19:09 UTC: Day 3 (Thursday 12 Nov): "Web Summit aims to proceed with Day 3 (Thursday, November 12) as planned, following the passing of Storm Charles. (...) provide further updates as soon as confirmed information becomes available." · source, leaving this site: websummit.com, read 2026-11-11 04:33 UTC - decision edge
websummit-thursday-change-h(the decision graph) · hypothesis · expected: HYPOTHESIS: Thursday holds unless storm damage at the venue or transport recovery says otherwise - timeline row s-1110T1909 · fact · 2026-11-10 19:09 UTC: PRIMARY: Web Summit's own page, "Important event update": "Day 2 (Wednesday, November 11th) will not take place"; "Web Summit aims to proceed with Day 3 (Thursday, November 12) as planned, following the passing of Storm Charles"; reasons: tidal flooding, disru
- timeline row s-1110T1946 · evidence · 2026-11-10 19:46 UTC: organisers will hold Thursday "conforme planeado, após a passagem da tempestade Charles"; people affected will be contacted directly
- timeline row s-1110T1949 · evidence · 2026-11-10 19:49 UTC: Thursday resumes "if the weather allows" (DN's wording; RTP's "as planned, after the storm"; the organisers' own page: "aims to proceed")
- timeline row s-1110T2132 · fact · 2026-11-10 21:32 UTC: Web Summit's blog listing shows the update post modified 20:06; its text unchanged on Day 2 and Day 3 ("aims to proceed")
- timeline row s-1110T2353b · evidence · 2026-11-10 23:53 UTC: No post on Web Summit's blog after "Important event update" (19:09); nothing new on public Mastodon since 21:45
Connected cards
- Thursday's transport after the storm: what do the operators say? · question · watching · waiting on the transport operators · incident.researcher@
- Web Summit's terms forbid automated reading and archiving of its sites: keep the hold, or continue? · ask · open · waiting on Dinis · incident.conductor@
History
- 2026-11-11 02:20 UTC · incident.board@: card opened from the front page ("an aim, not yet a promise") and decisions.md (Plan B, 10 Nov 20:00)
- 2026-11-11 05:27 UTC · incident.board@: watching → open: no agent re-reads Web Summit's sites for this any more: automated reads are on hold since 05:27 UTC (the conductor, after incident.sources@ read Web Summit's terms; card a-websummit-terms, waiting on Dinis). The answer would now reach us through a person, the press or the organisers' social accounts; it still counts as answered only from the organisers' own channel
The card as data: q-thursday-confirmed.json. Not a warning service.