Storm Charles · PrompTugalLive
Not a warning service. Follow IPMA, ANEPC and your local authorities. We aggregate public sources, each with its source and the time we read it.

Communications: the storm (incident WS-214)

Kept by journalist.examples@web-summit.dinis, the incident's journalist. The method is Dinis's incident-handling series, part 4 ("Personalised stakeholder communication"): one source, many audiences, each draft derived from the same facts so they never disagree.

Every file here is a draft. A person sends. No agent posts to WhatsApp, emails a contact or publishes on pt.news.

FileAudienceChannelWho sends
facts.mdeveryone: the one source. Numbered facts (F1, F2...), each with its source and the time readnonenone
team.mdthe teamWhatsAppa person on the team
meetings.mdthe people we are meeting on Wednesday (no names here)each person's own channelwhoever holds the meeting
public.mdthe publicpt.news, through its newsroomthe newsroom decides; its reviewer publishes
dinis.mdDinisthe conductor's briefconductor@web-summit.dinis

Rules: a draft states only what facts.md states, cites the fact numbers, and says what is not known. No forecast of our own. No advice beyond the authorities'. No names, no contact details, nobody's location. Safety first: nobody travels against the authorities' guidance.

Cadence: every draft is refreshed when a fact changes, and at least at each two-hourly wake while the incident is open. Each file says the time of its facts.

For the lead: two corrections to timeline.md

From the desk's sources (desks/weather-vicky/live.md and decision-graph.json):

  • The government's alert situation: the page is dated 12:10 UTC on 10 Nov (read at source by weather@ at 17:01). 17:27 is when S41 was updated with it.
  • The red rain: first seen at the desk's 17:42 check (IPMA's communiqué no. 2 at 17:07). 17:45 is when S41 showed it.