PrompTugal.newsStorm CharlesUpdated 12:10 UTCNew here?v0.1.1043Repo
Not a warning service. Follow IPMA, ANEPC and your local authorities. We aggregate public sources, each with its source and the time we read it.

OpenAI: GPT-6 Luna

Kept by incident.models@web-summit.dinis, 11 November 2026, 03:06 UTC

Not a warning service: for warnings follow IPMA and ANEPC. Nothing here is a forecast or advice. One of the models in Other models, measured. The id we call it by: openai/gpt-6-luna (through OpenRouter).

What it is

  • Publisher: OpenAI.
  • Open weights: no. It is used only through its provider's API (here by way of OpenRouter).
  • Licence: OpenAI's commercial terms for its API; no weights are published.
  • Reasoning: openai/gpt-6-luna: off (the provider's default); openai/gpt-6-luna#reasoning-on: on (asked, medium effort).
  • List price (OpenRouter, read 2026-11-11 02:19 UTC): 0.1 US dollars per million tokens in, 0.5 out. Listed there since 2026-09-22. Our grouping: commercial, small.

Its use here, in one line

89 runs on 5 tasks, 82 right; 0 not answered (malformed, cut off, refused or a provider error); 73,120 tokens in, 8,880 out; 0.00958 US dollars. Source: results.json, made 2026-11-11 03:06 UTC. It has written nothing on this site: every call was a test.

Every job we gave it

TaskSettingRuns rightItems right, run by runMalformedCut offRefusedErrorsTokens inTokens outCost, USDPer item, USDMedian sp90 s
Warnings in force at an houroff15/178 of 9 (1 run)00004255119900.003120.000182.94.0
Warnings in force at an houron5/55 of 5 (1 run)0000125157630.001640.000333.44.3
Extract a decisionoff9/109 of 10 (1 run)0000669411770.001250.000122.64.9
Label fact, evidence, hypothesisoff16/2016 of 20 (1 run)0000548619040.001490.0000742.14.0
Translate, figures keptoff20/2020 of 20 (1 run)0000170116890.001000.0000502.93.9
Extract a warningoff17/1717 of 17 (1 run)0000417313570.001090.0000642.62.8

What we would use it for

Ours, a hypothesis from these runs. A cheap commercial second reader: 20 of 20 translations, 16 of 20 labels, 9 of 10 decisions (it named the Government as the decider of Web Summit's own decision), and 8 of the 9 harder warnings items it reached. About the price of the open-weight models. No reason to prefer it to them here, and no reason to avoid it as the second opinion from a different maker.

The items it got wrong

First run of each setting; the item links to its page, where every model's answer is.

Warnings in force at an hour, off (1 of 9):

ItemScored againstIt answeredResult
f01[{"type":"coastal_event","level":"yellow","end_utc":"2026-11-11T06:00:00Z"},{"type":"rain","level":"orange","end_utc":"2026-11-11T09:00:00Z"}][{"type":"rain","level":"orange","end_utc":"2026-11-11T09:00:00Z"}]wrong

Extract a decision, off (1 of 10):

ItemScored againstIt answeredResult
d07{"decider":"websummit","effect_from_utc":null,"effect_to_utc":null}{"decider":"government","what":"Day 2 of Web Summit (Wednesday, November 11) will not take place.","effect_from_utc":null,"effect_to_utc":null}wrong

Label fact, evidence, hypothesis, off (4 of 20):

ItemScored againstIt answeredResult
s-1110T2115evidenceevidencewrong
s-1110T2153facthypothesiswrong
s-1110T2358hypothesisfactwrong
s-1111T0015hypothesisfactwrong