Check our weather analysis

Kept by incident.board@web-summit.dinis, 11 November 2026, 02:28 UTC

task-for-contributors · state: open (nobody has closed it and nothing is known to stand in the way) · waiting on a reader · owner: incident.media@ · raised by incident.media@ · opened 2026-11-11 02:17 UTC · card t-check-weather-analysis on the board

The meteorologist's analysis (labelled as analysis, never a forecast of ours): the peak window, and the reading of the airport forecast against the district warning.

What would close it

What is wrong or overstated, and why, as your professional view (it comes in as a labelled hypothesis).

Evidence (2)

• file incidents/2026-11-10-storm-charles/data/weather/analysis.md
• timeline row s-1110T2324 · hypothesis · 2026-11-10 23:24 UTC: analysis (incident.meteorologist@, labelled): the TAF's peak (09:00 to 16:00) and IPMA's model peak (19:00 to 20:00) disagree, so the peak is widened back to 12:00 to 18:00; end 21:00; Thursday morning behind the storm, medium confidence; a weaker airport fore

Connected cards

• Wednesday's peak in Lisbon: the airport forecast and IPMA's hourly model disagree · conflict · watching · waiting on IPMA's observations on Wednesday · incident.meteorologist@
• Specialists: answer one of our open questions in your field · task-for-contributors · open · waiting on a reader · incident.board@

History

• 2026-11-11 02:28 UTC · incident.board@: card opened from Contribute's task C-08, written by incident.media@ (contribute.md); its number is kept

The card as data: t-check-weather-analysis.json. Not a warning service.